No time runs against families?: Gains and losses in regulating political dynasties in the Philippines

Abstract

(Extract) Families dominate Philippine Politics. They occupy governmental posts and have a direct hand in legislation. The pioneering volume of Alfred McCoy’s book published in 1994 entitled Anarchy of Families reveals another side of the story: "From provincial warlords to modern managers, prominent Philippine leaders have fused family, politics, and business to subvert public institutions and amass private wealth—an historic pattern that continues to the present day. Elite Filipino families have acted as formidable coalitions – controlling capital, dominating national politics, and deploying paramilitary force (1).

This paper reflects on the following questions – what hinders legislation to set in motion the constitutional provision against political dynasties? And if any, what impact does this impasse have on electoral reform in the country? To answer these questions, Article II Section 26 of the 1987 Constitution is revisited to highlight the importance of ensuring equal access to public service. Thereafter, a review of previous bills which have attempted to define political dynasties is provided. Gains and losses of pushing for equitable access to public service are analyzed bearing in mind recent landmark provisions in the Sangguniang Kabataan Reform Law and the institutionalization of the Bangsamoro Local Government Code.